When I was a kid, I never thought it was odd to have a sister that was just 15 months older than me. It seemed really natural. My sister and I rarely fought, we played together all the time, and I counted her as one of my best friends. When we traveled we were always equally excited about our destination because there was no difference between the age-appropriateness of the activities we enjoyed.
When my first child was six months old, I happily announced to the members of my mom's group that my husband and I were going to try for baby number two. My announcement was met with shock and, yes, horror. Two under two? What could I possibly be thinking?
I was pretty shocked myself to be met with such a negative reaction. Yes, it was challenging taking care of a newborn. But I'd never had any reason to doubt that I wanted to have my children close together, so that they could share childhood experiences in the same way that my sister and I had. Two under two was the plan I'd had pretty much my whole life--and add to that the fact that I was already in my 30s and running out of productive child-bearing years, and it seemed like two under two was a pretty obvious choice.
But no one else thought my husband and I were making a good choice. People warned me to "wait at least a year." They said our decision would actually be bad for our son, who would have to leave his babyhood too soon to make room for his new sibling. They told us we needed to spend more time enjoying our son before adding another child to the family.
I don't recall listening to this advice with anything but anger. I realize now that the "norm" is to space kids about three years apart, but most of the siblings I knew with three or more years between them didn't play peacefully together like my sister and I had. They fought, and they even went so far as to claim that they hated each other. I couldn't see how such a combative relationship was "better for the children," as everyone was telling me.
And what right did all those people have to tell me what was best for my family?
I know they meant well. People never believe that the choices they made for their own families could be anything other than perfect. They think they can just drop their own decisions into other people's situations and everything will come out just as rosy. After all, it worked for them so why shouldn't it work for everyone?
Now I not only have had two under two, but three under four, and soon to be four under five. And I haven't regretted my decision even for a second. My kids have that relationship I always wanted them to have. They play together, they like the same things, and they are on their way to having lifelong friendships with each other.
Two under two was right for us. I know it's not right for everyone, but it was right for us.
When my first child was six months old, I happily announced to the members of my mom's group that my husband and I were going to try for baby number two. My announcement was met with shock and, yes, horror. Two under two? What could I possibly be thinking?
I was pretty shocked myself to be met with such a negative reaction. Yes, it was challenging taking care of a newborn. But I'd never had any reason to doubt that I wanted to have my children close together, so that they could share childhood experiences in the same way that my sister and I had. Two under two was the plan I'd had pretty much my whole life--and add to that the fact that I was already in my 30s and running out of productive child-bearing years, and it seemed like two under two was a pretty obvious choice.
But no one else thought my husband and I were making a good choice. People warned me to "wait at least a year." They said our decision would actually be bad for our son, who would have to leave his babyhood too soon to make room for his new sibling. They told us we needed to spend more time enjoying our son before adding another child to the family.
I don't recall listening to this advice with anything but anger. I realize now that the "norm" is to space kids about three years apart, but most of the siblings I knew with three or more years between them didn't play peacefully together like my sister and I had. They fought, and they even went so far as to claim that they hated each other. I couldn't see how such a combative relationship was "better for the children," as everyone was telling me.
And what right did all those people have to tell me what was best for my family?
I know they meant well. People never believe that the choices they made for their own families could be anything other than perfect. They think they can just drop their own decisions into other people's situations and everything will come out just as rosy. After all, it worked for them so why shouldn't it work for everyone?
Now I not only have had two under two, but three under four, and soon to be four under five. And I haven't regretted my decision even for a second. My kids have that relationship I always wanted them to have. They play together, they like the same things, and they are on their way to having lifelong friendships with each other.
Two under two was right for us. I know it's not right for everyone, but it was right for us.





